I believe that I have covered this in past blog posts, but I may be one of the greater procrastinators on the planet. During one of my late night procrastipades whilst putting off some chemistry or pre calc assignment, I found myself on YouTube, as I so often do. Somehow, the related video gods on YouTube brought me to a series of clips from the O'Reilly Factor. Now, I've seen enough of Bill O'Reilly in the media and on the Colbert Report and Daily Show on Comedy Central to know that he's a super-conservative and sometimes says some arguable things, however I never really knew the extent of how ludicrous his right-wing views really were until I watched a good half dozen or so of his videos.
After I felt that I had a good understanding of Bill O'Reilly's tactic to argument, I went ahead and posted a tweet that reads as follows: Bill O'Reilly's guide to argument - 1) Fabricate information 2) Cut off opposition mid sentence 3) Get flustered, possibly kick off guest
After I felt that I had a good understanding of Bill O'Reilly's tactic to argument, I went ahead and posted a tweet that reads as follows: Bill O'Reilly's guide to argument - 1) Fabricate information 2) Cut off opposition mid sentence 3) Get flustered, possibly kick off guest
Perhaps I should elaborate, not only to satisfy the word count but also because I really do have a growing rancor for Bill O'Reilly that needs to be satisfied. First off, how about we discuss the first point of my tweet: fabricated information. It has been noted on numerous occasions that the O'Reilly Factor, really FOX News in general, has fabricated, manipulated, and tweaked information to support their claims, however ambitious. I will leave a few links to back up my claims, as O'Reilly really should do, because I don't want to spend five hundred words illustrating every false accusation that he has made.
Another infamous trait that O'Reilly has that he comes back to time and time again when he hears something that he doesn't like out of his guest's mouth is that he cut them off. Literally in mid-sentence, you will see guests of the O'Reilly Factor get more and more frustrated as Bill repeatedly doesn't allow them to finish their argument. I suppose in theory you have a stronger argument if the other side has an incomplete thesis but when you cut them off yourself it is just plain unprofessional. So, after he cuts them off, Bill likes to morph his position into something that better suits a stance against his opposition. The best I have seen anybody react to this was when John Stewart was debating the criticism that Obama was getting by Fox News for having Common in the White House. When O'Reilly began to speak over him, Stewart simply backed off and made sure that O'Reilly left out his entire debate on the floor. After he did that Stewart was able to trample all over it. By letting Bill think that he has won and getting all he has to say out, Stewart was able to come in, uninterrupted, and deface his argument.
The last thing the O'Reilly does shows more cowardice than either of the first two examples. There have been times where O'Reilly is so defeated that he will either cancel the interview and by making the excuse that he was too upset, which really gets the conservatives all riled up, or he just won't invite a guest on again. Christopher Hitchens was on the O'Reilly Factor and after making Bill look like the little bitch that he is, wasn't invited back. So yeah, I don't like Bill O'Reilly.
The last thing the O'Reilly does shows more cowardice than either of the first two examples. There have been times where O'Reilly is so defeated that he will either cancel the interview and by making the excuse that he was too upset, which really gets the conservatives all riled up, or he just won't invite a guest on again. Christopher Hitchens was on the O'Reilly Factor and after making Bill look like the little bitch that he is, wasn't invited back. So yeah, I don't like Bill O'Reilly.